Carbon nanotubes were supposed to replace silicon. The Internet was supposed to route around failures. Both bets aged badly.
Lanier said software was too brittle to scale. Twenty-one years later, transformers and evolutionary code search make the case for Kurzweil’s self-organizing bet.
Kurzweil bet that humor and claimed feelings would settle the consciousness debate by the 2030s. The capability arrived four years early. The debate did not end — it intensified.
Six 2005 society-scale predictions, graded against 2026 patent grants, FDA rules, GDP data, and Meta’s Reality Labs balance sheet.
Awareness has saturated; the bridges to radical life extension haven’t. A scorecard on Kurzweil’s longevity predictions twenty years on.
The 2020s were supposed to inflect life expectancy upward. They didn’t. But the molecular machinery Kurzweil predicted just entered human trials.
Kurzweil predicted nano-fuel cells and microwings. We got lithium-ion automotive packs and FAA Stage 4 type certification — same destination, wrong chemistry.
Twenty years after The Singularity Is Near, some of the rebuttal chapters aged worse than the forecasts. The microtubule critics, the input-latency critics, and the reversible-computing skeptics all have new data.
Kurzweil bet the 2020s would bring three-dimensional computing. He was right about the destination and wrong about the path.
Kurzweil promised by the 2010s we’d wear computers in our clothing and see displays through our contacts. The destination came, but through phones, earbuds, and Ray-Bans — not the vehicles he named.