-
The AI tools you use every day — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini — are, in a meaningful sense, frozen in time. They learned everything they know during a multi-month training run, and then the learning stopped. New research published in 2025 and 2026 is attacking this problem from five different angles simultaneously. Here’s what’s actually working,…
-
SciPy 1.0 was published in February 2020. In the twelve months ending October 2025 it was cited 1,731 times. That is a five-year-old methods paper picking up roughly five new citations per day, with the rate still climbing. Its acceleration over the prior year is +94 per month, the third highest in the entire top-300…
-
Most “trending papers” lists are annual cuts: how many times a paper got cited this year versus last. That misses the shape of the curve. A paper that quietly clocked 200 citations evenly across twelve months looks identical to one that went from 5 per month to 40 per month. The second is actually taking…
-
In 2023 the European Society of Cardiology published its first comprehensive guideline on cardiomyopathies. OpenAlex has already logged more than 2,100 citations to that single document, a pace that puts it among the fastest-accelerating clinical papers of 2024. The guideline itself is not the story. The story is what it quietly codified: a drug class…
-
Steven Pinker’s Enlightenment Now proves that, on a 200-year baseline, almost everything is up and to the right. Peter Thiel’s The End of the Future argues that, since 1973, almost nothing in the physical world is. Both can be true. The trick is to plot each metric on its own longest available baseline and see…
-
Peter Thiel said in 2011 that the future had stalled. Ray Kurzweil said in 2005 that the future was on schedule. Reading both texts now, with a 9.3-million-patent corpus running underneath them, the answer is that they were arguing about different decades — and that the inflection between those decades happened, with disconcerting precision, the…
-
What started as a search for hidden innovation in medical devices turned into something bigger — a vision for how AI-driven R&D will need to coordinate across fields, and the infrastructure that doesn’t exist yet.
-
Betavoltaic battery patents are quietly stacking up after a dead decade — and the new entrants are a Florida pacemaker startup, Korea’s atomic institute, and the company that makes a third of the world’s EV batteries.
-
VoIP and Tornado Cash prove Kurzweil right — code can outrun the state. But 2025’s record internet shutdowns and lawful-decryption patents show the institutions learned to route back.
-
Ammonia is the fuel that almost works. A Charlotte spin-out with ten patents and a NASCAR pedigree is cracking it into hydrogen on a moving engine, using waste heat nobody else is chasing.
-
We learned to grow chicken without the chicken — exactly as Kurzweil predicted. Then seven states banned it and the funding collapsed 90%.
-
Kurzweil predicted intelligent weapons would make war precise and less deadly. Cheap autonomous drones made it precise and far deadlier — and the nanobots never showed.
-
US patents for carbon-fiber ‘massless’ batteries tripled since 2022. The two deepest American portfolios belong to a carmaker and a Pentagon think tank, not a battery company.
-
Kurzweil’s energy predictions are aging well. His bet that open markets, not governments, would safely steer AI is the one cracking.
-
Bolt Threads killed Mylo and MycoWorks went bankrupt, yet US mycelium patents hit an all-time high in 2025. The reason: Hermès and Nike are quietly filing their own.
-
Kurzweil bet the human-AI merger would run through electrodes and nanobots. It arrived through a chat window instead — and the real brain implants are doing something else entirely.