-
SciPy 1.0 was published in February 2020. In the twelve months ending October 2025 it was cited 1,731 times. That is a five-year-old methods paper picking up roughly five new citations per day, with the rate still climbing. Its acceleration over the prior year is +94 per month, the third highest in the entire top-300…
-
Most “trending papers” lists are annual cuts: how many times a paper got cited this year versus last. That misses the shape of the curve. A paper that quietly clocked 200 citations evenly across twelve months looks identical to one that went from 5 per month to 40 per month. The second is actually taking…
-
In 2023 the European Society of Cardiology published its first comprehensive guideline on cardiomyopathies. OpenAlex has already logged more than 2,100 citations to that single document, a pace that puts it among the fastest-accelerating clinical papers of 2024. The guideline itself is not the story. The story is what it quietly codified: a drug class…
-
Steven Pinker’s Enlightenment Now proves that, on a 200-year baseline, almost everything is up and to the right. Peter Thiel’s The End of the Future argues that, since 1973, almost nothing in the physical world is. Both can be true. The trick is to plot each metric on its own longest available baseline and see…
-
Peter Thiel said in 2011 that the future had stalled. Ray Kurzweil said in 2005 that the future was on schedule. Reading both texts now, with a 9.3-million-patent corpus running underneath them, the answer is that they were arguing about different decades — and that the inflection between those decades happened, with disconcerting precision, the…
-
What started as a search for hidden innovation in medical devices turned into something bigger — a vision for how AI-driven R&D will need to coordinate across fields, and the infrastructure that doesn’t exist yet.
-
Nine of ten nanotech milestones Kurzweil cited in 2005 were real. Almost none reached a product through the mechanism he named.
-
Kurzweil forecast diamondoid respirocytes in bloodstreams by the 2020s. What arrived instead is a 1.8-millimeter magnetic microrobot entering human trials in 2026 — right direction, wrong scale by three orders of magnitude.
-
The 2005 genetics chapter got the timelines mostly right. It got the machines, companies, and methods mostly wrong.
-
Of ten nanotech-for-the-environment predictions from 2005, the one with no named material — better lighting saving 200 Mt CO2/year — blew past its number by 2x. Almost every specific mechanism stayed in the lab.
-
Kurzweil bet on hydrogen cars, microbial cells, and sonofusion in 2005. Silicon photovoltaics quietly won everything.
-
Kurzweil bet on methanol laptops and coal with sequestration; lithium-ion won, FutureGen died, and the distributed fuel cell is booming — just inside AI data centers.
-
Kurzweil listed exotic computing substrates in 2005 as heirs to silicon. Twenty-one years on, silicon won by getting weirder — and his lone forward bet, that quantum stays special-purpose, has aged best of all.
-
Ten 2005 predictions about transistors, DNA computing, autonomic systems, battlefield networks, and cosmic compute limits — scored against 2026 reality.
-
Kurzweil’s prediction that trained skills could move between machines in seconds arrived early, decoupled from biology. The nanobots never came.
-
Ray Kurzweil’s brain-AI merger is happening. Cortical speech BCIs hit 62 words per minute, Ray-Ban Meta glasses put live translation on the lens, and autonomous munitions are already deployed — but the nanobots he said would deliver all of it never showed up.